Accountability, trust and informed consent in medical practice and research

96Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

During the last 25 years public policy in the UK has aimed to replace 'club' cultures and their supposedly suspect reliance on trust between professionals and public with a new public culture based on accountability and 'transparency'. These transformations have changed both clinical practice and public health policy in deep ways. Are the new conceptions of accountability adequate? Are obligations to be 'transparent' any more than requirements to disclose information which overlook the need for genuine communication? Can demands for ever fuller informed consent improve accountability to individual patients and research subjects? Could we devise more intelligent conceptions of accountability that support more intelligent placing and refusal of trust? What might intelligent conceptions of accountability suggest about proper clinical practice, public health medicine and professional responsibilities?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Neill, O. (2004). Accountability, trust and informed consent in medical practice and research. In Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London (Vol. 4, pp. 269–276). Royal College of Physicians. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.4-3-269

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free