The use of clay modeling to increase high school biology vocabulary learning

1Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The paper explored the benefits as well as the concerns of vocabulary learning with clay modeling in terms of practical and pedagogical implications for creating positive learning experiences. Design/methodology/approach: A mixed-methods design was conducted to examine the effectiveness of vocabulary learning with clay modeling practices in lower socioeconomic status schools. Findings: Although test results showed no statistically significant differences between the groups, the clay modeling group did improve vocabulary acquisition similar to the sentence writing group. The students were actively engaged with hands-on activities using the clay and also demonstrated positive emotional, behavioral and physical experiences. Research limitations/implications: The addition of the clay modeling provided an opportunity for kinesthetic learning but created a high extraneous cognitive load with the challenges incurred through the use of clay. Practical implications: The challenges can be reduced by 1) adopting appropriate instructional strategies to design and implement effective clay modeling activities for students and teachers, 2) providing training or professional workshop development for teachers and 3) ongoing practical support and assistance for students. Social implications: Exploring the use of kinesthetic instructional practice at the high school level may prove beneficial since clay modeling is frequently used effectively at lower grade levels. Originality/value: The current study explores the added value of clay modeling for high school students’ biology vocabulary learning in a lower socioeconomic status school from practical and pedagogical perspectives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bailey, R., Kim, D., Bochenko, M. J., Yang, C., Dees, D. C., & Jung, J. (2022). The use of clay modeling to increase high school biology vocabulary learning. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, 15(2), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-07-2021-0053

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free