Are the advantages of chess expertise on visuo-spatial working-memory capacity domain specific or domain general?

7Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Chess experts have repeatedly demonstrated exceptional recall of chessboards, which is weakened by disruption of the chessboard. However, chess experts still perform better than novices when recalling such disrupted chessboards, suggesting a somewhat generalized expertise effect. In the current study, we examined the extent of this generalized expertise effect on early processing of visuo-spatial working memory (VSWM), by comparing 14 chess experts (Elo rating > 2000) and 15 novices on a change-detection paradigm using disrupted chessboards, where attention had to be selectively deployed to either visual or spatial features, or divided across both features. The paradigm differed in the stimuli used (domain-specific chess pieces vs. novel visual shapes) to evaluate domain-general effects of chess expertise. Both experts and novices had greater memory discriminability for chess stimuli than for the unfamiliar stimuli, suggesting a salience advantage for familiar stimuli. Experts, however, demonstrated better memory discriminability than novices not only for chess stimuli presented on these disrupted chessboards, but also for novel, domain-general stimuli, particularly when detecting spatial changes. This expertise advantage was greater for chessboards with supra-capacity set sizes. For set sizes within the working-memory capacity, the expertise advantage was driven by enhanced selective attention to spatial features by chess experts when compared to visual features. However, any expertise-related VSWM advantage disappeared in the absence of the 8 × 8 chessboard display, which implicates the chessboard display as an essential perceptual aspect facilitating the “expert memory effect” in chess, albeit one that might generalize beyond strictly domain-relevant stimuli.

References Powered by Scopus

The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance

6313Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity

4852Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions

3198Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Defining intelligence: Bridging the gap between human and artificial perspectives

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Persistent gender differences in spatial ability, even in STEM experts

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

KIBRA Gene Variant Is Associated with Ability in Chess and Science

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, E. T., Bartlett, J. C., Krawczyk, D. C., & Basak, C. (2021). Are the advantages of chess expertise on visuo-spatial working-memory capacity domain specific or domain general? Memory and Cognition, 49(8), 1600–1616. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01184-z

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 6

55%

Neuroscience 4

36%

Computer Science 1

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free