The article deals with normative aspects that are negotiated in didactic and subject-specific theoretical debates and thus gain relevance in teaching. It turns out that the didactic theories provide divergent answers to the question of what should be taught how and by whom. Similarly, the example of theoretical debates in International Relations shows that, from a subject-specific perspective, there can often be a lack of consensus on the essentials that are to be taught. Such conflicting requirements, however, demonstrate the instructors’ scope for action, which they should realize and use responsibly. Due to academic pluralism, it seems possible that the societal pluralism, which is sometimes perceived as crisis-laden, can be used productively for teaching.
CITATION STYLE
Eckl, J. (2018). Theories as Latent Sources of Normativity and Responsibility in University Teaching: the Importance of Didactic and Subject-Specific Theory Debates in the Case of “International Relations.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 59(4), 737–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-018-0116-6
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.