Theories as Latent Sources of Normativity and Responsibility in University Teaching: the Importance of Didactic and Subject-Specific Theory Debates in the Case of “International Relations”

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The article deals with normative aspects that are negotiated in didactic and subject-specific theoretical debates and thus gain relevance in teaching. It turns out that the didactic theories provide divergent answers to the question of what should be taught how and by whom. Similarly, the example of theoretical debates in International Relations shows that, from a subject-specific perspective, there can often be a lack of consensus on the essentials that are to be taught. Such conflicting requirements, however, demonstrate the instructors’ scope for action, which they should realize and use responsibly. Due to academic pluralism, it seems possible that the societal pluralism, which is sometimes perceived as crisis-laden, can be used productively for teaching.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eckl, J. (2018). Theories as Latent Sources of Normativity and Responsibility in University Teaching: the Importance of Didactic and Subject-Specific Theory Debates in the Case of “International Relations.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 59(4), 737–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-018-0116-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free