Effects of a culturally specific tobacco cessation intervention among African American Quitline enrollees: A randomized controlled trial

19Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: African Americans suffer disproportionately from tobacco-related illness and have more difficulty quitting smoking than other racial/ethnic groups. Previous research indicates that African American treatment-seekers are high utilizers of tobacco quitlines, yet cessation rates via quitlines are lower relative to whites. The goal of the present study is to test the effectiveness of adding a culturally specific, video-based, adjunct to standard quitline care. It is hypothesized that the integration of an evidence-based intervention (Pathways to Freedom: Leading the Way to a Smoke-Free Community ©; PTF) into quitline services will increase cessation and treatment engagement compared to control conditions, and that effects will be moderated by sociocultural factors (e.g., culturally specific intervention expectancies, acculturation, and ethnic identity). Methods: This study is a 3-arm semi-pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants will be 1050 enrollees in the North Carolina State quitline (QuitlineNC) who self-identify as African American. Usual quitline care includes up to 4 proactive quit coaching calls, website access, and two-weeks of nicotine patch therapy. Eligible study participants will be randomized to receive (1) standard quitline services plus PTF (PTF); (2) quitline services plus a standard tobacco cessation DVD (attention control); or (3) quitline services alone (usual care). Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3 and 6-months post-enrollment. The primary outcome will be biochemically verified 7 day ppa at 6-months. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) and hierarchical logistic regression will be used to assess the effects of treatment group on cessation outcomes and to test potential moderators. Discussion: This study will answer questions regarding the implementation and effectiveness of integrating a culturally specific video intervention into a real-world, population-level tobacco intervention. It will also aid our understanding of individual-difference variables that are associated with success. If an incremental benefit is found, this trial will have implications for increasing the responsiveness of tobacco quitlines for African Americans, reducing tobacco cessation disparities, and best practices for improving minority health. In addition, the PTF intervention has the potential for widespread disseminated through quitlines, which are available across the United States.

References Powered by Scopus

A global measure of perceived stress.

22418Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support

8703Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The patient health questionnaire-2: Validity of a two-item depression screener

4742Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Rapid Scaling up of Telehealth Treatment for Tobacco-Dependent Cancer Patients during the COVID-19 Outbreak in New York City

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cultural Sensitivity and Cultural Tailoring: Lessons Learned and Refinements After Two Decades of Incorporating Culture in Health Communication Research

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Achieving Equity in the Reach of Smoking Cessation Services within the NCI Cancer Moonshot-Funded Cancer Center Cessation Initiative

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Webb Hooper, M., Carpenter, K., Payne, M., & Resnicow, K. (2018). Effects of a culturally specific tobacco cessation intervention among African American Quitline enrollees: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-5015-z

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 35

67%

Researcher 12

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 16

35%

Nursing and Health Professions 12

26%

Psychology 10

22%

Social Sciences 8

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free