A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma

266Citations
Citations of this article
160Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated in a large cohort of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) using a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for articles published up to 8 June 2019, with no date limit on the indexed database. Clinical end points stratified by MRD status (positive or negative) were extracted, including hazard ratios (HRs) on PFS and OS, P values, and confidence intervals (CIs). HRs were estimated based on reconstructed patient-level data from published Kaplan- Meier curves. Forty-four eligible studies with PFS data from 8098 patients, and 23 studies with OS data from 4297 patients were identified to assess the association between MRD status and survival outcomes. Compared with MRD positivity, achieving MRD negativity improved PFS (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.29-0.37; P < .001) and OS (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.39-0.51; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Munshi, N. C., Avet-Loiseau, H., Anderson, K. C., Neri, P., Paiva, B., Samur, M., … Bahlis, N. (2020). A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Advances, 4(23), 5988–5999. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002827

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free