While there are many similarities between the languages of the various workflow management systems, there are also significant differences. One particular area of differences is caused by the fact that different systems impose different syntactic restrictions. In such cases, business analysts have to choose between either conforming to the language in their specifications or transforming these specifications afterwards. The latter option is preferable as this allows for a separation of concerns. In this paper we investigate to what extent such transformations are possible in the context of various syntactical restrictions (the most restrictive of which will be referred to as structured workflows). We also provide a deep insight into the consequences, particularly in terms of expressive power, of imposing such restrictions.
CITATION STYLE
Kiepuszewski, B., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., & Bussler, C. J. (2000). On structured workflow modelling. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 1789, pp. 431–445). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36926-1_19
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.