Are polarised elections the hardest to deliver? Explaining global variations in electoral management body performance

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Electoral management, understood as the application and implementation of electoral rules, is a critical part of democratic governance. But there are often concerns about the quality of electoral management and the performance of electoral management bodies around the world. Despite recent advances, there remains a need for new systematic evidence on the quality of electoral management and analysis of the factors that lead to poorly- or well- run elections. This article therefore maps out global variations in the quality of the public management of elections using a new cross-national dataset and measure. It then explains variations by evaluating the relative importance of bureaucratic culture, the autonomy of electoral authorities, political polarisation in the electorate and the capacity of electoral management bodies. The results provide support for the importance of each of these factors. The effect of political polarisation is an important finding as it is a new threat to elections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

James, T. S., & Garnett, H. A. (2023). Are polarised elections the hardest to deliver? Explaining global variations in electoral management body performance. South African Journal of International Affairs, 30(3), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2023.2271496

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free