Cost-effectiveness of using the Cervex-Brush (broom) compared to the elongated spatula for collection of conventional cervical cytology samples within a high-burden HIV setting: A model-based analysis

8Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: From 2010 to 2014, approximately 2 million Pap smears from HIV-infected women were submitted to the South African National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS) through the national cervical cancer screening programme. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether using the plastic Cervex brush ("broom") would be a cost-effective approach to improve cytology specimen quality as compared to the wooden spatula used currently. Methods: A decision analysis model was built using the expected adequacy rates for samples collected with the spatula (

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schnippel, K., Michelow, P., Chibwesha, C. J., Makura, C., Lince-Deroche, N., Goeieman, B., … Firnhaber, C. (2015). Cost-effectiveness of using the Cervex-Brush (broom) compared to the elongated spatula for collection of conventional cervical cytology samples within a high-burden HIV setting: A model-based analysis. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1163-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free