A comparative study of two reference estimation methods in EEG recording

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In [1] we proposed two methods to identify the reference electrode signal under the key assumption that the reference signal is independent from EEG sources. This assumption is shown to be possibly true for intracranial EEG with a scalp reference. In this paper, we theoretically prove that the obtained reference signal by using the second method in [1] or the equivalent MPDR approach [1] outperforms the widely used average reference (AR) if the real reference is independent from EEG sources. The simulation results confirm the advantages over AR. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, S., Cao, Y., Chen, S., Zhang, J., Kong, W., Yang, K., … Zhang, Y. (2012). A comparative study of two reference estimation methods in EEG recording. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7366 LNAI, pp. 321–328). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31561-9_36

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free