The effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic lung disease

8Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: It is known that pulmonary rehabilitation improves dyspnea and exercise tolerance in patient with chronic lung disease, although it does not improve pulmonary function. But there is a controversy whether this improvement after pulmonary rehabilitation is due to increased aerobic exercise capacity. We performed this study to evaluate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation for 6 weeks on the pulmonary function, gas exchange, exercise tolerance and aerobic exercise capacity in patients with chronic lung disease. Methods: Pulmonary rehabilitations including education, muscle strengthening exercise and symptom-limited aerobic exercise for six weeks, were performed in fourteen patients with chronic lung disease (COPD 11, bronchiectasis 1, IPF 1, sarcoidosis 1; mean age 57 ± 4 years: male 12, female 2). Pre- and post-rehabilitation pulmonary function and exercise capacity were compared. Results: 1) Before the rehabilitation, FVC, FEV1 and FEF(25-75%) of the patients were 71.5 ± 6.4%, 40.6 ± 3.4% and 19.3 ± 3.8% of predicted value respectively. TLC, FRC and RV were 130.3 ± 9.3%, 157.3 ± 13.2% and 211.1 ± 23.9% predicted respectively. Diffusing capacity and MVV were 59.1 ± 1.1% and 48.6 ± 6.2%. These pulmonary functions did not change after pulmonary rehabilitation. 2) In the incremental exercise test using bicycle ergometer, maximum work reate (57.7 ± 4.9 watts vs. 64.8 ± 6.0 watts, P=0.036), maximum oxygen consumption (0.81 ± 0.07 L/min vs. 0.96 ± 0.08 L/min, P=0.004) and anaerobic threshold (0.60 ± 0.06 L/min vs. 0.76 ± 0.06 L/min, P=0.009) were significantly increased after pulmonary rehabilitation. There was no improvement in gas exchange after rehabilitation. 3) Exercise endurances of upper (4.5 ± 0.7 joule vs. 14.8 ± 2.4 joule, P<0.001) and lower extremity (25.4 ± 5.7 joule vs. 42.6 ± 7.7 joule, P<0.001), and 6 minute walking distance (392 ± 35 meter vs. 459 ± 33 meter, P<0.001) were significantly increased after rehabilitation. Maximum inspiratory pressure was also increased after rehabilittion (68.5 ± 5.4 cmH2O vs. 80.4 ± 6.4 cmH2O, P<0.001). Conclusion: The pulmonary rehabilitation for 6 weeks can improve exercise performance in patients with chronic lung disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Choe, K. H., Park, Y. J., Cho, W. K., Lim, C. M., Lee, S. D., Koh, Y., … Kim, W. D. (1996). The effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic lung disease. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 43(5), 736–745. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.1996.43.5.736

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free