How journalism responds to right-wing populist criticism: The "lying press" attack and the "no censorship" or "no ammunition" defence

24Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Right-wing populists often criticise the established media for being untruthful or censoring what critics consider to be important information-for instance, the ethnic background of perpetrators-and for being biased against right-wing populist actors. That hostility towards journalism can be understood as a consequence of the right-wing populist worldview. Because such criticism uses professional norms of journalism against it and due to particular aspects of how journalism functions, it remains difficult for journalists to respond to such criticism. Certain responses risk confirming and even normalising the right-wing populist worldview.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krämer, B. (2018). How journalism responds to right-wing populist criticism: The “lying press” attack and the “no censorship” or “no ammunition” defence. In Trust in Media and Journalism: Empirical Perspectives on Ethics, Norms, Impacts and Populism in Europe (pp. 137–154). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20765-6_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free