Distinctions in disclosure: Mandated informed consent in abortion and ART

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Enactment of mandated pre-procedure disclosures in abortion and assisted reproductive technology (ART) services has swelled in recent years. Calls to equally regard these mandates as neutral tools in furtherance of patient protection fail to acknowledge key substantive and structural differences in these reproduction-affecting mandates. While ART mandates permit physicians to use their medical judgment to protect presumptively vulnerable egg donors and gestational carriers, abortion disclosures impart scientifically suspect messaging aimed at dissuading women from pursuing pregnancy termination. These and other distinctions counsel in favor of regarding and analyzing abortion and ART mandated disclosures as separate and distinguishable informed consent tools.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Daar, J. (2015). Distinctions in disclosure: Mandated informed consent in abortion and ART. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 43(2), 255–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12240

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free