Multilaboratory trial for determination of ceftiofur residues in bovine and swine kidney and muscle, and bovine milk

13Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A multilaboratory trial for determining ceftiofur-related residues in bovine and swine kidney and muscle, and bovine milk was conducted following regulatory guidelines of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine. The methods convert all desfuroyl -ceftiofur-related residues containing the intact β-lactam ring to desfuroylceftiofur acetamide to establish ceftiofur residues in tissues. Four laboratories analyzed 5 sets of samples for each tissue. Each sample set consisted of a control/blank sample and 3 control samples fortified with ceftiofur at 0.5 Rm, Rm, and 2 Rm, respectively, where Rm is the U.S. tolerance assigned for ceftiofur residue in each tissue/matrix: 0.100 μg/mL for milk, 8.0 μg/g for kidney (both species), 1.0 μg/g for bovine muscle, and 2.0 μg/g for swine muscle. Each sample set also contained 2 samples of incurred-residue tissues (one > Rm and one < Rm) from animals treated with ceftiofur hydrochloride. All laboratories completed the method trial after a familiarization phase and test of system suitability in which they demonstrated >80% recovery in pretrial fortified test samples. Results showed that the methods met all acceptable performance criteria for recovery, accuracy, and precision. Although sample preparation was easy, solid-phase extraction cartridge performance must be carefully evaluated before samples are processed. The liquid chromatography detection system was easily set up; however, the elution profile may require slight modifications. The procedures could clearly differentiate between violative (>Rm) and nonviolative (

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hornish, R. E., Hamlow, P. J., & Brown, S. A. (2003). Multilaboratory trial for determination of ceftiofur residues in bovine and swine kidney and muscle, and bovine milk. Journal of AOAC International, 86(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/86.1.30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free