Correction: Systematic review and meta-analysis determining the benefits of in vivo genetic therapy in spinal muscular atrophy rodent models (Gene Therapy, (2022), 29, 9, (498-512), 10.1038/s41434-021-00292-4)

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this article, the title and caption of Table 3 were incorrectly given. They should have been as below. Table 3. Characteristics of clinical trials using Spinraza and Zolgensma. Outcome measures reported at set follow-up time points: Chiriboga et al. [75]: 9-14 months, Finkel et al. [77]: up to 32 months, Finkel et al. [78]: day 394, Mercuri et al. [79]: 15 months, Darras et al. [76]: days 253 and 1050, respectively, Mendell et al. [10]: 24 months. HFMSE, HINE-2, and CHOP-INTEND scores represent change from baseline. Finkel et al. [77] define motor milestone response as “improvement of two or more levels per motor milestone category in at least one category”. Finkel et al. [78] define motor milestone response as “improvement in at least one HINE-2 motor milestone with more categories with improvement than worsening”. Mercuri et al. [79] define motor milestone response as achievement of “≥1 new World Health Organisation motor milestone”.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chilcott, E. M., Muiruri, E. W., Hirst, T. C., & Yáñez-Muñoz, R. J. (2023, February 1). Correction: Systematic review and meta-analysis determining the benefits of in vivo genetic therapy in spinal muscular atrophy rodent models (Gene Therapy, (2022), 29, 9, (498-512), 10.1038/s41434-021-00292-4). Gene Therapy. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41434-022-00377-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free