Longitudinal perspectives of faculty and students on benefits and barriers to transdisciplinary graduate education: Program assessment and institutional recommendations

7Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Addressing complex societal problems, such as childhood obesity, requires transdisciplinary (TD) approaches to reach effective solutions. However, TD doctoral training programs in academic settings are still relatively new, and little is known about the benefits and barriers of participation. This study sought to longitudinally assess benefits and barriers of a TD approach to doctoral education from the perspectives of students working towards a joint PhD/MPH degree and their faculty advisors. Results show that benefits across 5-years included greater collaboration and networking, enhanced guidance and support, broadened ways of thinking, and expanded opportunities. Barriers included time demands, complicated logistics, and tension between depth versus breadth of knowledge. Similarities and differences among students and faculty are discussed. Findings provide resources for both faculty and students considering involvement with TD doctoral education, as well as for institutions and academic programs seeking to promote TD training and team science.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keck, A. S., Sloane, S., Liechty, J. M., Paceley, M. S., Donovan, S. M., Bost, K. K., … Fiese, B. H. (2017). Longitudinal perspectives of faculty and students on benefits and barriers to transdisciplinary graduate education: Program assessment and institutional recommendations. Palgrave Communications, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0027-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free