RSM and MLR model for equivalent stress prediction of Eicher 11.10 chassis frame: A comparative study

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The main objective of the study is to compare the prediction accuracy of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Multiple Linear Regressions (MLR) model for the Equivalent stress of the chassis frame. The chassis frame is made of two sidebars connected with a series of crossbar. The web thickness, upper flange thickness and lower flange thickness of sidebar becomes the design variables for the optimization. Since the number of parameters and levels are more, so the probable models are too many. The variants of the frame are achieved by topology modification using the orthogonal array. Then Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is performed on those models. RSM model and MLR model are prepared using the results of FEA to predict equivalent stress on the chassis frame. The results indicate that predictions of RSM model are more accurate than predictions of MLR model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patel, T. M., & Bhatt, N. M. (2016). RSM and MLR model for equivalent stress prediction of Eicher 11.10 chassis frame: A comparative study. In Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (Vol. 51, pp. 387–395). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30927-9_38

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free