Joseph Agassi, the M2T Seminar, and His Influence on My Work

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper discusses the influence on my research and writings of several methodological principles that we, the members of the LSE Staff Seminar on Methodology, Measurement and Testing, learned directly from Joseph Agassi and indirectly from Karl Popper. It begins with the origins of the seminar and my textbook, An Introduction to Positive Economics. It goes on to cover methodological issues that arose in my subsequent papers, including: the importance of having empirical content in economic theories, the poverty of theories that are built only to pass sunrise tests, why non-robust assumptions need to be tested, the concept of refutability, the fussy distinction between normative and positive statements, the impossibility of giving purely positive policy advice, the testing of existential statements, fallacious attempts to deduce empirical propositions from definitional identities, the distinction between internally and externally driven research programs, the poverty of modern welfare economics as a guide to policy and the possibility of deriving policy advice without such guidance. It concludes with a short discussion of the revolutionary implications of accepting technological change as being generated endogenously under conditions of genuine uncertainty rather than measurable risk.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lipsey, R. G. (2017). Joseph Agassi, the M2T Seminar, and His Influence on My Work. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Vol. 325, pp. 467–489). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57669-5_37

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free