Widespread Flaws in Offline Evaluation of Recommender Systems

5Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Even though offline evaluation is just an imperfect proxy of online performance - due to the interactive nature of recommenders - it will probably remain the primary way of evaluation in recommender systems research for the foreseeable future, since the proprietary nature of production recommenders prevents independent validation of A/B test setups and verification of online results. Therefore, it is imperative that offline evaluation setups are as realistic and as flawless as they can be. Unfortunately, evaluation flaws are quite common in recommender systems research nowadays, due to later works copying flawed evaluation setups from their predecessors without questioning their validity. In the hope of improving the quality of offline evaluation of recommender systems, we discuss four of these widespread flaws and why researchers should avoid them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hidasi, B., & Czapp, Á. T. (2023). Widespread Flaws in Offline Evaluation of Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2023 (pp. 848–855). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3604915.3608839

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free