In the original article [1], there were the following mistakes:-In Table 4, where it reads “kap” it should read “kap”.-In Table 4, where it reads “C0” it should read “C0”.-In page 13, on last sentence, where it reads “in spite of being part of time equivalent to Figure 4, primarily” it should read “in spite of being part of time equivalent to the F3, primarily”.-In page 14, in the first paragraph, where it reads “it modified the buffering conditions (Figure 3) and reduced both the COD removal efficiency (Figure 2A and Table 1) and kinetic coefficient kap (Table 3)” it should be read “it modified the buffering conditions (Figure 3) and reduced both the COD removal efficiency (Figure 2A and Table 1) and kinetic coefficient kap (Table 4)”. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.
CITATION STYLE
Pereira, E. L., Borges, A. C., & da Silva, G. J. (2022, March 1). Correction: Pereira et al. Effect of the Progressive Increase of Organic Loading Rate in an Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor for Biodiesel Wastewater Treatment. Water 2022, 14, 223. Water (Switzerland). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060901
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.