In vitro evaluation of microleakage in class II composite restorations: High-viscosity bulk-fill vs conventional composites

32Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study compared marginal microleakage of Class II cavities restored with bulk-fill resin (Filtek™ Bulk Fill) and conventional composite resin (Filtek™ Supreme XTE). Two standardized Class II cavities were prepared in forty extracted human molars. The gingival margin was located above the cemento-enamel junction for twenty molars (groups 1 and 2) and apically for the other twenty (groups 3 and 4) (n=20). The occlusomesial cavity was filled with bulk-fill resin by insertion in bulk (groups 1 and 3) and the occlusodistal cavity was restored with conventional composite using incremental technique (groups 2 and 4). The teeth were thermocycled (500 cycles 5–55°C), stained and observed under light microscope. The microleakage was significantly lower in gingival margins located in enamel compared with dentin margins (p<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 (p=0.86) and groups 3 and 4 (p=0.26). Bulk-Fill resins presents gingival microleakage similar to conventional composites.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

García Marí, L., Climent Gil, A., & Llena Puy, C. (2019). In vitro evaluation of microleakage in class II composite restorations: High-viscosity bulk-fill vs conventional composites. Dental Materials Journal, 38(5), 721–727. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-160

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free