Efeitos a curto e longo prazo de um grupo de desenvolvimento de habilidades sociais para universitários

4Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In spite of the trend to implement evidence-based practices in community settings, we know little about the efficacy of interventions outside research contexts. There is a lack of empirical studies on the effects of social skills training in real-world contexts that include sufficient numbers of participants and follow up studies. The short and long-term effects of a social skills training of 34 college students were investigated in a real world setting. Social skills (IHS) and anxiety (STAI) scores were checked before and after the intervention and after a follow up interval. Both anxiety and social skills improved from the pre-test to post-test, and both remained stable from the post-test to follow-up after 3 months to 5 years.

References Powered by Scopus

Clinical Significance: A Statistical Approach to Defining Meaningful Change in Psychotherapy Research

8200Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance

756Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Test anxiety and academic performance in undergraduate and graduate students

464Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Social Skills and Drugs: Systematic Review of National and International Scientific Production

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Psychological interventions with university students in student support services

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social Skills Training in undergraduate students: a systematic review

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferreira, V. S., Oliveira, M. A., & Vandenberghe, L. (2014). Efeitos a curto e longo prazo de um grupo de desenvolvimento de habilidades sociais para universitários. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 30(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722014000100009

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

76%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Researcher 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 21

88%

Computer Science 1

4%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

4%

Neuroscience 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0