Comparative analysis of similarity measurements in miRNAs with applications to miRNA-disease association predictions

13Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: As regulators of gene expression, microRNAs (miRNAs) are increasingly recognized as critical biomarkers of human diseases. Till now, a series of computational methods have been proposed to predict new miRNA-disease associations based on similarity measurements. Different categories of features in miRNAs are applied in these methods for miRNA-miRNA similarity calculation. Benchmarking tests on these miRNA similarity measures are warranted to assess their effectiveness and robustness. Results: In this study, 5 categories of features, i.e. miRNA sequences, miRNA expression profiles in cell-lines, miRNA expression profiles in tissues, gene ontology (GO) annotations of miRNA target genes and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms of miRNA-associated diseases, are collected and similarity values between miRNAs are quantified based on these feature spaces, respectively. We systematically compare the 5 similarities from multi-statistical views. Furthermore, we adopt a rule-based inference method to test their performance on miRNA-disease association predictions with the similarity measurements. Comprehensive comparison is made based on leave-one-out cross-validations and a case study. Experimental results demonstrate that the similarity measurement using MeSH terms performs best among the 5 measurements. It should be noted that the other 4 measurements can also achieve reliable prediction performance. The best-performed similarity measurement is used for new miRNA-disease association predictions and the inferred results are released for further biomedical screening. Conclusions: Our study suggests that all the 5 features, even though some are restricted by data availability, are useful information for inferring novel miRNA-disease associations. However, biased prediction results might be produced in GO- A nd MeSH-based similarity measurements due to incomplete feature spaces. Similarity fusion may help produce more reliable prediction results. We expect that future studies will provide more detailed information into the 5 feature spaces and widen our understanding about disease pathogenesis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, H., Guo, R., Li, G., Zhang, W., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Comparative analysis of similarity measurements in miRNAs with applications to miRNA-disease association predictions. BMC Bioinformatics, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-3515-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free