Hard spheres revisited: Accurate calculation of the solid-liquid interfacial free energy

55Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We revise the earlier [R. L. Davidchack and B. B. Laird, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4751 (2000)] direct calculation of the hard sphere solid-liquid interfacial free energy by the cleaving walls method. The revisions of the method include modified interactions with the cleaving walls and the use of a nonequilibrium work measurements approach, which allows for a more robust control of the accuracy of the obtained results. We find that the new values are lower compared to the original ones, which is consistent with the more recent indirect estimates based on extrapolation from the soft-sphere results [R. L. Davidchack and B. B. Laird, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 086102 (2005)], as well as those obtained using the capillary fluctuations method [R. L. Davidchack, J. R. Morris, and B. B. Laird, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 094710 (2006)]. © 2010 American Institute of Physics.

References Powered by Scopus

Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences

4175Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficient estimation of free energy differences from Monte Carlo data

2337Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements: A master-equation approach

1164Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Computer simulation of liquids: Second edition

6736Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Two-step nucleation mechanism in solid-solid phase transitions

272Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Seeding approach to crystal nucleation

181Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davidchack, R. L. (2010). Hard spheres revisited: Accurate calculation of the solid-liquid interfacial free energy. Journal of Chemical Physics, 133(23). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3514144

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

62%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

27%

Researcher 2

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 11

46%

Materials Science 7

29%

Chemistry 3

13%

Engineering 3

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0