Comparison of Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging and multiecho dynamic contrast-based MRI in rectal cancer

Abstract

Background: Dynamic contrast-based MRI and intravoxel incoherent motion imaging (IVIM) MRI are both methods showing promise as diagnostic and prognostic tools in rectal cancer. Both methods aim at measuring perfusion-related parameters, but the relationship between them is unclear. Purpose: To investigate the relationship between perfusion- and permeability-related parameters obtained by IVIM-MRI, T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI and T2*-weighted dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-MRI. Study Type: Prospective. Subjects: In all, 94 patients with histologically confirmed rectal cancer. Field Strength/Sequence: Subjects underwent pretreatment 1.5T clinical procedure MRI, and in addition a study-specific diffusion-weighted sequence (b = 0, 25, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 1300 s/mm2) and a multiecho dynamic contrast-based echo-planer imaging sequence. Assessment: Median tumor values were obtained from IVIM (perfusion fraction [f], pseudodiffusion [D*], diffusion [D]), from the extended Tofts model applied to DCE data (Ktrans, kep, vp, ve) and from model free deconvolution of DSC (blood flow [BF] and area under curve). A subgroup of the excised tumors underwent immunohistochemistry with quantification of microvessel density and vessel size. Statistical Test: Spearman's rank correlation test. Results: D* was correlated with BF (rs = 0.47, P < 0.001), and f was negatively correlated with kep (rs = –0.31, P = 0.002). BF was correlated with Ktrans (rs = 0.29, P = 0.004), but this correlation varied extensively when separating tumors into groups of low (rs = 0.62, P < 0.001) and high (rs = –0.06, P = 0.68) BF. Ktrans was negatively correlated with vessel size (rs = –0.82, P = 0.004) in the subgroup of tumors with high BF. Data Conclusion: We found an association between D* from IVIM and BF estimated from DSC-MRI. The relationship between IVIM and DCE-MRI was less clear. Comparing parameters from DSC-MRI and DCE-MRI highlights the importance of the underlying biology for the interpretation of these parameters. Level of Evidence: 2. Technical Efficacy: Stage 1. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1114–1124.