Estimating the number of remaining links in traceability recovery

26Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although very important in software engineering, establishing traceability links between software artifacts is extremely tedious, error-prone, and it requires significant effort. Even when approaches for automated traceability recovery exist, these provide the requirements analyst with a, usually very long, ranked list of candidate links that needs to be manually inspected. In this paper we introduce an approach called Estimation of the Number of Remaining Links (ENRL) which aims at estimating, via Machine Learning (ML) classifiers, the number of remaining positive links in a ranked list of candidate traceability links produced by a Natural Language Processing techniques-based recovery approach. We have evaluated the accuracy of the ENRL approach by considering several ML classifiers and NLP techniques on three datasets from industry and academia, and concerning traceability links among different kinds of software artifacts including requirements, use cases, design documents, source code, and test cases. Results from our study indicate that: (i) specific estimation models are able to provide accurate estimates of the number of remaining positive links; (ii) the estimation accuracy depends on the choice of the NLP technique, and (iii) univariate estimation models outperform multivariate ones.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Falessi, D., Di Penta, M., Canfora, G., & Cantone, G. (2017). Estimating the number of remaining links in traceability recovery. Empirical Software Engineering, 22(3), 996–1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9460-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free