Social inequities between prenatal patients in family medicine and obstetrics and gynecology with similar outcomes

4Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Family Medicine (FM) physicians play a vital role in caring for vulnerable populations across diverse practice settings. The significant decline in FM physicians performing deliveries compounds the estimated shortage of 9000 prenatal care providers expected by 2030. This study investigated the social risk profile, as characterized by social determinants of health, of patients receiving prenatal care from FM versus Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/Gyn) providers. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients receiving prenatal care between 2015 to 2018 at Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center comparing social determinants of health between FM and OB/Gyn. Results: A total of 487 patient charts were reviewed with final analysis completed on 215 charts from each cohort. When compared with OB/Gyn, prenatal patients cared for by FM were more likely to be younger (27 vs 29 years old; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Partin, M., Sanchez, A., Poulson, J., Berg, A., Parascando, J., & Ramirez, S. I. (2021). Social inequities between prenatal patients in family medicine and obstetrics and gynecology with similar outcomes. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 34(1), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.01.200279

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free