Pro-active asset entities in collaborative networks

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In a Collaborative Network (CN) scenario it would be desirable that CN members could be able to start collaboration within their Virtual Organization Breeding Environments or Professional Virtual Communities in a short time-frame, whenever a new Business Opportunity appears. As a contribution towards such dynamic scenario, this paper proposes the concepts of Assets Entity, Pro-Active Assets Entity and Integrated Market of Pro-Active Assets Entities. The first concept can be used to model attributes and all functional and intelligent content elements a CN member can provide (its Assets). The second is responsible for the representation and promotion of an Assets Entity. The later offers an adaptation of the market place concept where each Pro-Active Assets Entity registers itself, brokers post their needs and try to find the best providers, through a bidding and negotiation process. © 2010 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

References Powered by Scopus

Methods and tools for collaborative networked organizations

95Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Service agents and virtual enterprises: A survey

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Agents and service-oriented computing for autonomic computing: A research agenda

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Pro-activity in collaborative Service Ecosystems

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ProActive service entity framework: Improving service selection chances within large senior professional virtual community scenario

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cardoso, T., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2010). Pro-active asset entities in collaborative networks. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 314, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11628-5_10

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

33%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 5

50%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

30%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

10%

Engineering 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free