Recent meta-analyses in the clinical high risk for psychosis population: Clinical interpretation of findings and suggestions for future research

23Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One of the major advances over the past 20 years in psychiatry is the capacity not only to identify people at incipient risk for psychosis and other disabling mental disorders, but also to improve their levels of distress and functioning and reduce their risk of progression to sustained psychotic disorder, at least while treatment is being provided and for at least 1-2 years from baseline. These statements are supported by level 1 Cochrane evidence and one would expect this progress to be understood and valued by a field in need of positive findings pointing to better outcomes. It is therefore puzzling why recent meta-analyses appear to have focused on second order issues and in doing so have distracted from the key message of this research literature and fuelled the traditional skepticism and pessimism with which our discipline is so replete.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nelson, B., Amminger, G. P., & McGorry, P. D. (2018, October 12). Recent meta-analyses in the clinical high risk for psychosis population: Clinical interpretation of findings and suggestions for future research. Frontiers in Psychiatry. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00502

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free