Comparison of tracheal wash and bronchoalveolar lavage cytology in 154 horses with and without respiratory signs in a referral hospital over 2009-2015

44Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Most equine lower respiratory diseases present as increased airway neutrophilia, which can be detected in tracheal wash (TW) or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cytology samples. The aim was to compare the TW and BALF results in a population of client-owned horses with and without clinical respiratory disease signs. A secondary aim was to determine the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of TW and BALF neutrophilia in detecting respiratory disease. The cutoff values for neutrophils were also evaluated. Retrospective data from 154 horses of various breeds that had been subject to both TW and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) sampling at rest during 2009-2015 were used. The horses were divided into three groups based on the presenting signs, physical examination, and endoscopy mucus score. Neutrophil counts of > 20% in TW and > 5% in BAL were considered abnormal. Cytology results between groups, correlations between TW and BALF cell types, and tracheal mucus score were analyzed. Two graph receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the neutrophil percentage values of TW and BALF were created to determine the optimal cutoff values and to calculate the diagnostic Se and Sp for diagnosing airway inflammation in horses with and without clinical respiratory signs. The Se and Sp of TW and BALF neutrophil percentages were further estimated using a two-test one-population Bayesian latent class model. The two tests showed substantial agreement, and only 17.5% of the horses were classified differently (healthy vs. diseased). The neutrophil percentage was found to correlate between TW and BALF. The Se and Sp of TW were generally higher than for BAL when estimated with area under the curve or Bayesian model. Cutoff values of 17.7% for TW and 7% for BALF were indicated by the ROCs. We conclude that TW is a more sensitive and specific method in our patient population. We suggest that the current neutrophil cutoff values of 20% for TW and 5% for BALF would still be appropriate to use in clinical diagnosis of airway inflammation. However, further studies with other cell types and in other populations are warranted to determine the best sampling method for individual horses.

References Powered by Scopus

The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

60221Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic

12913Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums

3603Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Equine Asthma: Current Understanding and Future Directions

85Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Airway Diagnostics: Bronchoalveolar Lavage, Tracheal Wash, and Pleural Fluid

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Metabolomics of tracheal wash samples and exhaled breath condensates in healthy horses and horses affected by equine asthma

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rossi, H., Virtala, A. M., Raekallio, M., Rahkonen, E., Rajamäki, M. M., & Mykkänen, A. (2018). Comparison of tracheal wash and bronchoalveolar lavage cytology in 154 horses with and without respiratory signs in a referral hospital over 2009-2015. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5(MAR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00061

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

59%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

12%

Researcher 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 31

76%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

5%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 64

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free