Effectiveness of social marketing strategies to reduce youth obesity in European school-based interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

48Citations
Citations of this article
235Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Context: The use of social marketing to modify lifestyle choices could be helpful in reducing youth obesity. Some or all of the 8 domains of the National Social Marketing Centre's social marketing benchmark criteria (SMBC) are often used but not always defined in intervention studies. Objective: The aim of this review is to assess the effectiveness of European school-based interventions to prevent obesity relative to the inclusion of SMBC domains in the intervention. Data Sources: The PubMed, Cochrane, and ERIC databases were used. Study Selection: Nonrandomized and randomized controlled trials conducted from 1990 to April 2014 in participants aged 5 to 17 years were included. Data Extraction: After the study selection, the 8 domains of the SMBC were assessed in each included study. Results: Thirty-eight publications were included in the systematic review. For the meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting body mass index or prevalence of overweight and obesity were considered. Eighteen RCTs with a total of 8681 participants included at least 5 SMBC. The meta-analysis showed a small standardized mean difference in body mass index of 0.25 (95%CI, 0.45 to 0.04) and a prevalence of overweight and obesity odds ratio of 0.72 (95%CI, 0.5-0.97). Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that the inclusion of at least 5 SMBC domains in schoolbased interventions could benefit efforts to prevent obesity in young people. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42014007297.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aceves-Martins, M., Llauradó, E., Tarro, L., Moreno-García, C. F., Escobar, T. G. T., Solà, R., & Giralt, M. (2016). Effectiveness of social marketing strategies to reduce youth obesity in European school-based interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition Reviews, 74(5), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuw004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free