Blinded review of papanicolaou smears

5Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The author reported that cytotechnologists and pathologists should not be held accountable for the local outcome consequences of global process shortcomings. Even if all identifiable process control factors were addressed and implemented, errors still would occur. False-negative Papanicolaou smears arise from the nature of the process, not the negligence of the practitioner. Respected cancer advocacy organizations should educate the public regarding the limitations of Papanicolaou test performance. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gill, G. W. (2005, April 25). Blinded review of papanicolaou smears. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20874

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free