Comparison of exposed dentinal surfaces resulting from abrasion and erosion

38Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the shape of exposed dentinal surfaces caused by abrasion and erosion with a view to developing a diagnostic clinical test. The study material consisted of 80 natural teeth and 129 dental models obtained from Australian Aborigines known to display considerable dental abrasion due to their diet, and dental models of 37 Caucasians diagnosed with dental erosion through detailed history and dietary analysis. Polyvinyl siloxane impressions were obtained of all occlusal surfaces with dentinal scooping in both the 'abrasion' and 'erosion' groups. All impressions were sectioned buccotingually through the deepest point of the scooped dentine, and then the profiles were photocopied at x 2 magnification. The breadth and depth of dentinal profiles were measured to an accuracy of 0.1 mm, enabling ratios of depth:breadth to be determined, and the position of the deepest part of each scooped surface was recorded. The mean depth:breadth ratio of scooped dentine was significantly greater in the Aboriginal natural teeth (0.19±0.06, mean±SE) than in the Aboriginal dental models (0.15±0.04). Both Aboriginal natural teeth and models with abrasion showed significantly smaller ratios (p<0.05) than the Caucasian models showing erosion (0.33±0.07). Furthermore, in the abrasion samples, the deepest region of the scooped dentine tended to be lingually placed more often in maxillary teeth but buccally placed more often in mandibular teeth (p<0.05). These results indicate that scooped dentine on abraded occlusal surfaces of teeth displays significant differences in shape compared with that caused mainly by erosion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bell, E. J., Kaidonis, J., Townsend, G., & Richards, L. (1998). Comparison of exposed dentinal surfaces resulting from abrasion and erosion. Australian Dental Journal, 43(5), 362–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb00190.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free