Discordant results of flow cytometric ZAP-70 expression status in B-CLL samples if different gating strategies are applied

16Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have identified ZAP-70 expression status as an excellent prognostic parameter in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). ZAP-70 expression can be determined by direct antibody staining followed by flow cytometric analysis. However, there are currently several different gating strategies for analysis. We compared those strategies for ZAP-70 expression analysis. Methods: One hundred and one patients with B-CLL were analyzed employing a directly labeled alexafluor-488-ZAP-70-antibody. In 27 cases, we additionally measured and analyzed ZAP-70 expression, together with healthy controls as described previously. Results: Applying either T-/NK-cell isotype or healthy control analysis strategies on patient samples that were processed in parallel revealed discrepant results in 48% (12/25) of all cases. Taken together with the 74 B-CLL patients, who were analyzed with regard to average reference values, disconcordant results were obtained in 58% of the samples. We demonstrate that high variances in ZAP-70 T-/NK-cell staining within B-CLL patients, paired with a close proximity of ZAP-70 B-cell values to the suggested cut-off levels, may lead to interpretation difficulties of ZAP-70 status. Conclusions: We conclude that different gating strategies for determining flow cytometric ZAP-70 expression status produce highly discordant results. Further standardization is required before ZAP-70 can be used as a reliable prognostic parameter in immunophenotyping of B-CLL. © 2006 International Society for Analytical Cytology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilhelm, C., Neubauer, A., & Brendel, C. (2006). Discordant results of flow cytometric ZAP-70 expression status in B-CLL samples if different gating strategies are applied. Cytometry Part B - Clinical Cytometry, 70(4), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.20123

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free