Sex Differences in Maximal Oxygen Uptake Adjusted for Skeletal Muscle Mass in Amateur Endurance Athletes: A Cross Sectional Study

2Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Male athletes tend to outperform female athletes in several endurance sports. Maximum cardiac output can be estimated by maximal oxygen consumption ((Formula presented.)), and it has been established that men present (Formula presented.) values about 20% higher than women. Although sex differences in (Formula presented.) have already been well studied, few studies have assessed sex differences with regard to muscle oxidative capacity. The aim of this study was to compare aerobic muscle quality, accessed by (Formula presented.) and adjusted by lower limb lean mass, between male and female amateur triathletes. The study also aimed to compare sex differences according to (Formula presented.) submaximal values assessed at ventilatory thresholds. A total of 57 participants (23 women and 34 men), who had been training for Olympic-distance triathlon races, underwent body composition evaluation by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and performed a cardiorespiratory maximal test on a treadmill. Male athletes had significantly higher (Formula presented.), both absolutely and when adjusted to body mass. Conversely, when (Formula presented.) was adjusted for lean mass, there was no significant difference between sexes. The same was observed at submaximal exercise intensities. In conclusion, differences in (Formula presented.) adjusted to body mass but not lean mass may explain, at least in part, sex differences in performance in triathlons, marathons, cycling, and other endurance sports.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martins, H. A., Barbosa, J. G., Seffrin, A., Vivan, L., Souza, V. R. dos A., De Lira, C. A. B., … Andrade, M. S. (2023). Sex Differences in Maximal Oxygen Uptake Adjusted for Skeletal Muscle Mass in Amateur Endurance Athletes: A Cross Sectional Study. Healthcare (Switzerland), 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11101502

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free