Why cumulative decomposition is not as bad as it sounds

44Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The global cumulative constraint was proposed for modelling cumulative resources in scheduling problems for finite domain (FD) propagation. Since that time a great deal of research has investigated new stronger and faster filtering techniques for cumulative, but still most of these techniques only pay off in limited cases or are not scalable. Recently, the "lazy clause generation" hybrid solving approach has been devised which allows a finite domain propagation engine possible to take advantage of advanced SAT technology, by "lazily" creating a SAT model of an FD problem as computation progresses. This allows the solver to make use of SAT nogood learning and autonomous search capabilities. In this paper we show that using lazy clause generation where we model cumulative constraint by decomposition gives a very competitive implementation of cumulative resource problems. We are able to close a number of open problems from the well-established PSPlib benchmark library of resource-constrained project scheduling problems. © 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schutt, A., Feydy, T., Stuckey, P. J., & Wallace, M. G. (2009). Why cumulative decomposition is not as bad as it sounds. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5732 LNCS, pp. 746–761). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04244-7_58

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free