Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI-assisted mental health care: A systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice

35Citations
Citations of this article
404Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Machine-learning algorithms and big data analytics, popularly known as ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI), are being developed and taken up globally. Patient and public involvement (PPI) in the transition to AI-assisted health care is essential for design justice based on diverse patient needs. Objective: To inform the future development of PPI in AI-assisted health care by exploring public engagement in the conceptualization, design, development, testing, implementation, use and evaluation of AI technologies for mental health. Methods: Systematic scoping review drawing on design justice principles, and (i) structured searches of Web of Science (all databases) and Ovid (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Global Health and Embase); (ii) handsearching (reference and citation tracking); (iii) grey literature; and (iv) inductive thematic analysis, tested at a workshop with health researchers. Results: The review identified 144 articles that met inclusion criteria. Three main themes reflect the challenges and opportunities associated with PPI in AI-assisted mental health care: (a) applications of AI technologies in mental health care; (b) ethics of public engagement in AI-assisted care; and (c) public engagement in the planning, development, implementation, evaluation and diffusion of AI technologies. Conclusion: The new data-rich health landscape creates multiple ethical issues and opportunities for the development of PPI in relation to AI technologies. Further research is needed to understand effective modes of public engagement in the context of AI technologies, to examine pressing ethical and safety issues and to develop new methods of PPI at every stage, from concept design to the final review of technology in practice. Principles of design justice can guide this agenda.

References Powered by Scopus

Using thematic analysis in psychology

110446Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

6237Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews

4508Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review

77Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Health Care Practice: Scoping Review

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Voice-Activated Virtual Home Assistant Use and Social Isolation and Loneliness Among Older Adults: Mini Review

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zidaru, T., Morrow, E. M., & Stockley, R. (2021, August 1). Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI-assisted mental health care: A systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice. Health Expectations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13299

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 83

65%

Researcher 25

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 30

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 22

24%

Computer Science 19

21%

Social Sciences 19

21%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free