Parity or Disparity? Outcomes of Court-Involved Youth With and Without Disabilities

2Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Youth with disabilities are overrepresented in the juvenile justice system, but few studies have investigated the mechanisms by which this occurs. In this study, we considered how juvenile court adjudication and length of commitment in secure facilities contributed to disproportionality in court involvement and detention, addressing an important gap in the intersection of disability and juvenile justice literature. Using linked educational and juvenile justice records of 41,812 youth, we sought to ascertain whether, among juvenile offenders, youth with disabilities had higher likelihood of adjudication as delinquent or placement in secure facilities for longer periods of time compared to youth without disabilities. Results indicated that youth with and without disabilities were adjudicated and placed similarly, suggesting that disparities contributing to overrepresentation of youth with disabilities in detained populations may manifest earlier in youths’ involvement in the justice system. We conclude with implications for research, policy, and practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kincaid, A. P., & Sullivan, A. L. (2020). Parity or Disparity? Outcomes of Court-Involved Youth With and Without Disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 41(6), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519887502

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free