Digital financial inclusion and welfare: Effect, mechanism and imbalance

2Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study utilizes provincial panel data from China spanning from 2013 to 2019 and considers indices such as residents' income, employment, housing, education, and medical care to comprehensively measure the welfare index of each province using the coefficient of variation. It also examines the impact and mechanism of digital financial inclusion on welfare and evaluates its influence on welfare imbalance through panel data models and RIF regression. The estimation results of digital financial inclusion on welfare indicate that digital financial inclusion is an important driver elevating the income, employment, housing, education, medical treatment and other welfares of Chinese residents, and the conclusion remains robust after using instrumental variable estimation and replacing the measurement method of welfare. Regional differences reveal that digital financial inclusion has a greater contribution to the welfare in the Midwest. The effect mechanism test shows that digital financial inclusion improves the welfare by creating employment opportunities and plays a greater role in the Midwest, and will also improve the welfare by increasing the welfare expenditure. However, this mechanism will exacerbate the welfare imbalance between the Midwest and East. The estimation results of digital financial inclusion on the welfare imbalance show that digital financial inclusion reduces welfare imbalance between the central and western regions and the eastern regions, as well as within the central and western regions.

References Powered by Scopus

Finance and growth: schumpeter might be right

4213Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Occupational choice and the process of development

1502Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mobile phones and economic development in Africa

1111Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Does shared prosperity affect perceived financial well-being among individual consumers?

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Impact of Land Circulation on Common Prosperity in the Digital Economy Context

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, Y. L., & Peng, J. (2023). Digital financial inclusion and welfare: Effect, mechanism and imbalance. PLoS ONE, 18(12 December). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278956

Readers over time

‘24‘25010203040

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 3

43%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

43%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 5

71%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

14%

Linguistics 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0