Comparison of anthropometric indicators to predict mortality in a population-based prospective study of children under 5 years in Niger

19Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: In the present study, we aimed to compare anthropometric indicators as predictors of mortality in a community-based setting.Design: We conducted a population-based longitudinal study nested in a cluster-randomized trial. We assessed weight, height and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) on children 12 months after the trial began and used the trial's annual census and monitoring visits to assess mortality over 2 years.Setting: Niger.Participants: Children aged 6-60 months during the study.Results: Of 1023 children included in the study at baseline, height-for-age Z-score, weight-for-age Z-score, weight-for-height Z-score and MUAC classified 777 (76·0 %), 630 (61·6 %), 131 (12·9 %) and eighty (7·8 %) children as moderately to severely malnourished, respectively. Over the 2-year study period, fifty-eight children (5·7 %) died. MUAC had the greatest AUC (0·68, 95 % CI 0·61, 0·75) and had the strongest association with mortality in this sample (hazard ratio = 2·21, 95 % CI 1·26, 3·89, P = 0·006).Conclusions: MUAC appears to be a better predictor of mortality than other anthropometric indicators in this community-based, high-malnutrition setting in Niger.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Brien, K. S., Amza, A., Kadri, B., Nassirou, B., Cotter, S. Y., Stoller, N. E., … Oldenburg, C. E. (2020). Comparison of anthropometric indicators to predict mortality in a population-based prospective study of children under 5 years in Niger. Public Health Nutrition, 23(3), 538–543. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980019002520

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free