Biofilm formation of Salmonella serotypes in simulated meat processing environments and its relationship to cell characteristics

61Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Salmonella attached to meat contact surfaces encountered in meat processing facilities may serve as a source of crosscontamination. In this study, the influence of serotypes and media on biofilm formation of Salmonella was investigated in a simulated meat processing environment, and the relationships between biofilm formation and cell characteristics were also determined. All six serotypes (Salmonella enterica serotype Heidelberg, Salmonella Derby, Salmonella Agona, Salmonella Indiana, Salmonella Infantis, and Salmonella Typhimurium) can readily form biofilms on stainless steel surfaces, and the amounts of biofilms were significantly influenced by the serotypes, incubation media, and incubation time used in this study. Significant differences in cell surface hydrophobicity, autoaggregation, motility, and growth kinetic parameters were observed between individual serotypes tested. Except for growth kinetic parameters, the cell characteristics were correlated with the ability of biofilm formation incubated in tryptic soy broth, whereas no correlation with biofilm formation incubated in meat thawing-loss broth (an actual meat substrate) was found. Salmonella grown in meat thawing-loss broth showed a "cloud- shaped" morphology in the mature biofilm, whereas when grown in tryptic soy broth it had a "reticulum-shaped" appearance. Our study provides some practical information to understand the process of biofilm formation on meat processing contact surfaces Copyright © International Association for Food Protection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, H., Ding, S., Dong, Y., Ye, K., Xu, X., & Zhou, G. (2013). Biofilm formation of Salmonella serotypes in simulated meat processing environments and its relationship to cell characteristics. Journal of Food Protection, 76(10), 1784–1789. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-093

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free