Explaining institutional strength: the case of national human rights institutions in Europe and its Neighbourhood

6Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

National human rights institutions have spread rapidly across Europe and its Neighbourhood consolidating their powers to protect human rights. Yet, we know little about the causes for change in the strength of national human rights institutions over time. We propose an analysis of institutional strength along two dimensions of safeguards–durability and enforcement–based on original data for 50 states. We illustrate the quantitative analysis with two case studies–Hungary and Poland. We find that European Union membership conditionality is the strongest predictor of increased strength in national human rights institutions. Additionally, we find evidence of democratic ‘lock-in’, as newly democratized states seek to increase the durability of their institutions. The influence of the United Nations and the European Union, through state networks, increases the strength of national human rights institutions, particularly their durability. The Council of Europe has a positive impact on the institutional safeguards for enforcement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lacatus, C. (2019). Explaining institutional strength: the case of national human rights institutions in Europe and its Neighbourhood. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(11), 1657–1677. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1545795

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free