Controle por regras: Efeitos de perguntas, propriedades formais de regras e esquemas de reforço

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aiming the investigation of the effects of some variables on rule following, 24 college students were submitted to a matching-to-sample procedure, with the task of pointing to the comparison stimuli in sequence. In Phase 1 the correct sequence was established by differential reinforcement in continuous reinforcement schedule. In Phases 2 and 3 the reinforcement contingencies were kept unchanged, and meanwhile rules (suggestion and mand) discrepant of the contingencies were manipulated. In Conditions 1 and 2, Phases 2 and 3 suggestion and mand were presented in this sequence. In Conditions 3 and 4 the presentation order was reversed. Questions concerning why the behavior was reinforced were presented only in Phase 1 of Conditions 1 and 3. Hundred percent participants did not follow the suggestion, 60% did not follow the mand. Results indicate that the history of alternative behavior to the specified by the rule, justifications, and questions may interfere with the discrepant--to-the-contingencies rule-following, and implications for the comprehension of the functions of the reinforcement contingencies and rules in the explanation of behavior.

References Powered by Scopus

RULE‐GOVERNED BEHAVIOR AND SENSITIVITY TO CHANGING CONSEQUENCES OF RESPONDING

262Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CONTINGENCY‐SHAPED AND RULE‐GOVERNED BEHAVIOR: INSTRUCTIONAL CONTROL OF HUMAN LOSS AVOIDANCE

199Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

DISCRIMINATION THEORY OF RULE‐GOVERNED BEHAVIOR

100Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gonçalves, A. S., de Albuquerque, L. C., & Paracampo, C. C. P. (2015). Controle por regras: Efeitos de perguntas, propriedades formais de regras e esquemas de reforço. Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, 28(3), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201528312

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 1

50%

Psychology 1

50%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free