Are snacking patterns associated with risk of overweight among Kahnawake schoolchildren?

21Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective To understand more specifically how the quality, quantity and frequency of snack food consumption differs in different BMI categories.Design Four hundred and forty-nine school-aged children (grade 4-6) from a Kanienkehaka (Mohawk) community provided a 24 h recall and their height and weight in 1994, 1998 and 2002, in three independent cross-sectional samples. Food consumed between two consecutive meals was defined as a snacking occasion. ANOVA and χ2 tests were used to compare food choices between BMI categories according to food quality criteria and food groups in 2006. Logistic regression models were performed to compare results between normal-weight children and those at risk of overweight and between normal-weight and overweight children.Results Energy intake from snacks tended to be higher for children at risk of overweight, compared with the other two BMI categories. Food groups with a higher energy density were also consumed more frequently by these children, with larger average portions of cereal bars (P < 0.05). Except for dessert consumption, which was less frequent among overweight children, no other variable distinguished risk of overweight in the two logistic regression models tested.Conclusions Differences detected in snack food intake between normal-weight children and children at risk of overweight could explain in part the relationship between food choices and risk of overweight. Studies of dietary differences in conjunction with body weight would benefit from considering children at risk of overweight and normal-weight children, rather than children with excess weight only. © 2009 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mercille, G., Receveur, O., & MacAulay, A. C. (2010). Are snacking patterns associated with risk of overweight among Kahnawake schoolchildren? Public Health Nutrition, 13(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980009990711

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free