Some goodness-of-fit methods for the Poisson plus added zeros distribution

22Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Methods for making inferences about the Poisson plus added zeros distribution and the truncated Poisson distribution are presented and illustrated with bacteriological data. Some of the methods are designed for testing the compatibility of the zero frequency with the Poisson distribution, whereas others are given for testing the goodness of fit for the truncated Poisson. In particular, a modified form of the Fisher index of dispersion is presented which is suitable for the truncated case. It is shown that the use of the usual expression of the index of dispersion for testing the adequacy of the truncated Poisson is not correct and leads to accepting inadequate fits more frequently than expected on the basis of test of significance. Furthermore, three test statistics are presented for testing the compatibility of the zero frequency with the Poisson distribution. The results of the simulation show that two test statistics, one due to Cochran (W.G. Cochran, Biometrics 10:417-451, 1954) and the other to Rao and Chakravarti (C.R. Rao and I.M. Chakravarti, Biometrics 12:264-282, 1956), are preferable to those from the likelihood ratio test.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Assessment of the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium or Giardia in drinking water from a surface water source

204Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using Statistical Methods for Water Quality Management: Issues, Problems and Solutions

113Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Zero-inflated poisson model in statistical process control

104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

El-Shaarawi, A. H. (1985). Some goodness-of-fit methods for the Poisson plus added zeros distribution. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 49(5), 1304–1306. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.49.5.1304-1306.1985

Readers over time

‘10‘12‘14‘16‘17‘18‘20‘21‘2200.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

33%

Researcher 4

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemistry 2

25%

Engineering 2

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

25%

Mathematics 2

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0