Assessing value of innovative molecular diagnostic tests in the concept of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine

38Citations
Citations of this article
181Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Molecular diagnostic tests drive the scientific and technological uplift in the field of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine offering invaluable clinical and socioeconomic benefits to the key stakeholders. Although the results of diagnostic tests are immensely influential, molecular diagnostic tests (MDx) are still grudgingly reimbursed by payers and amount for less than 5 % of the overall healthcare costs. This paper aims at defining the value of molecular diagnostic test and outlining the most important components of "value" from miscellaneous assessment frameworks, which go beyond accuracy and feasibility and impact the clinical adoption, informing healthcare resource allocation decisions. The authors suggest that the industry should facilitate discussions with various stakeholders throughout the entire assessment process in order to arrive at a consensus about the depth of evidence required for positive marketing authorization or reimbursement decisions. In light of the evolving "value-based healthcare" delivery practices, it is also recommended to account for social and ethical parameters of value, since these are anticipated to become as critical for reimbursement decisions and test acceptance as economic and clinical criteria.

References Powered by Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

68Citations
245Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Akhmetov, I., & Bubnov, R. V. (2015, September 30). Assessing value of innovative molecular diagnostic tests in the concept of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine. EPMA Journal. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13167-015-0041-3

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25010203040

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 64

55%

Researcher 30

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 19

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 44

53%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 19

23%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 11

13%

Business, Management and Accounting 9

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 14

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0