Intersectionality Theory, Challenges for Empirical Research and Contributions to Psychology

1Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Theory of Intersectionality is an important contribution from feminist epistemologies to the scientific field. This narrative literature review aims to discuss methodological possibilities and challenges in producing and analyzing empirical evidence based on the Theory of Intersectionality, as well as its contributions to Psychology. While this theory is increasingly being cited as the basis for empirical research, articulating its assumptions in knowledge production processes is still a difficulty. Qualitative approaches prevail in the field, but advancements in statistical analysis methods allow for an intersectional interpretation in quantitative studies. Intersectionality contributes to understanding psychological processes and challenging dominant and exclusionary assumptions in the field of Psychology. Embracing this theory requires a commitment to the imperative of social transformation and entails placing claims, values, practices, and power relations at the core of scientific knowledge production, regardless of the field under study.

References Powered by Scopus

The complexity of intersectionality

4328Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evidence-based practice in psychology

2209Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pursuing intersectionality, unsettling dominant imaginaries

473Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Adaptation and feasibility assessment of a dating violence prevention program for girls in foster care

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Castro Jury Arnoud, T., de Oliveira Chotgues, J., Marques, S. S., & Habigzang, L. F. (2023). Intersectionality Theory, Challenges for Empirical Research and Contributions to Psychology. Paideia, 33. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3327

Readers over time

‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 4

50%

Linguistics 2

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

13%

Social Sciences 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0