Key Point Analysis via Contrastive Learning and Extractive Argument Summarization

11Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Key point analysis is the task of extracting a set of concise and high-level statements from a given collection of arguments, representing the gist of these arguments. This paper presents our proposed approach to the Key Point Analysis shared task, collocated with the 8th Workshop on Argument Mining. The approach integrates two complementary components. One component employs contrastive learning via a siamese neural network for matching arguments to key points; the other is a graph-based extractive summarization model for generating key points. In both automatic and manual evaluation, our approach was ranked best among all submissions to the shared task.

References Powered by Scopus

Neural network-based abstract generation for opinions and arguments

103Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What is the essence of a claim? Cross-domain claim identification

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Summarizing online forum discussions - Can dialog acts of individual messages help?

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Do You Hear The People Sing? Key Point Analysis via Iterative Clustering and Abstractive Summarisation

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cone: Unsupervised Contrastive Opinion Extraction

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding fallacious reasoning via detecting moves of motivated criticism in Argument Continuity—a new strategy of circular reasoning in coping responses to disagreement within a distorted reasoning context

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alshomary, M., Gurke, T., Syed, S., Heinisch, P., Spliethöver, M., Cimiano, P., … Wachsmuth, H. (2021). Key Point Analysis via Contrastive Learning and Extractive Argument Summarization. In 8th Workshop on Argument Mining, ArgMining 2021 - Proceedings (pp. 184–189). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.argmining-1.19

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

65%

Researcher 4

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 18

75%

Linguistics 4

17%

Neuroscience 1

4%

Social Sciences 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free