Abstract
In chapter 5, I explained Husserl’s principle that transcendental phenomenology provides the ontology for the a priori sciences. What the basic objects, and the axioms governing them, in an a priori science are, is to be disclosed in phenomenological analysis. Now I want to show this idea in action: the constitution analysis of choice sequences, undertaken in the previous chapter, yields a justification of one of the basic principles for choice sequences.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
van Atten, M. (2007). Application: An Argument for Weak Continuity. In Synthese Library (Vol. 335, pp. 103–110). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5087-9_7
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free