Comparison of environmental loads with rail track systems using simplified life cycle assessment (LCA)

24Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ballast track has some advantages compared to concrete track in terms of noise reduction, drainage and so on. However, rail infrastructure has been exchanged from ballast track to concrete track due to the ease of maintenance without considering prior environmental impact. In order to accomplish superior environmental position in the transportation modes, the environmental characteristics of rail track systems should be investigated, as well as the rail vehicle. In this study, two rail track systems, gravel ballast and the concrete track system, constructed recently on the Seoul-Busan High-speed Line for running KTX (Korea Train eXpress), were compared by quantifying their environmental loads using a LCA tool. The life cycle inventory of track systems was analyzed from their material and energy flows through a whole process. In the future, the application of LCA into railway infrastructure can achieve a fundamental technology for sustainable development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, C. K., Lee, J. Y., & Kim, Y. K. (2008). Comparison of environmental loads with rail track systems using simplified life cycle assessment (LCA). In WIT Transactions on the Built Environment (Vol. 101, pp. 367–372). https://doi.org/10.2495/UT080361

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free